A maximum-severity path traversal in the Ubiquiti UniFi Network Application allows unauthenticated attackers to read and manipulate files on the underlying host, enabling full account takeover of the controller managing an organization’s switches, access points, and gateways.
CVE-2026-32746 is an emerging critical buffer overflow in GNU Inetutils telnetd. It allows pre-authentication remote code execution during Telnet option negotiation.
Modern security frameworks often fail by surfacing endless vulnerabilities without context. This blog explores how the CTEM frameworkâs Validation stage provides “permission to ignore” theoretical risks, allowing teams to focus engineering resources exclusively on confirmed, evidence-based, and exploitable threats.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) shifts security metrics from measuring activity to prioritizing impact. This refocuses reporting on urgent, validated issues and continuous testing coverage. By tracking remediation hours and material exposure reduction, organizations can effectively manage risk without creating unnecessary noise or alert fatigue.
CTEM reframed security around what attackers can actually reach and exploit. But Gartner didn’t provide an execution playbook. This blog breaks down what each stage demands in practice – and the anti-patterns that derail most programs.
Security teams are under constant pressure to find and fix vulnerabilities faster, but traditional approaches to security testing often create delays. In this blog, we explore why active security testing, despite its perception for being slow and resource intensive, is the key to achieving faster and more confident fixes. You will learn how accurate testing results drive smarter remediation decisions, how fully automated testing at scale overcomes common operational challenges, and why reducing your window of exposure requires moving beyond passive scanning. If your organization is struggling with long remediation cycles and hidden risks, this is the blueprint for accelerating your security outcomes.
External Attack Surface Management (EASM) promised to illuminate the unknown, but early tools barely scratched the surface, relying on what security teams already knew. Todayâs attacker-centric EASM flips the script, discovering unknown assets, mapping them to the business, and validating real-world risk with zero input. The result isnât just visibilityâitâs proof of exposure, and a clear path to action.
Savvy security leaders are moving from the legacy framework of vulnerability management to the emerging framework of exposure management. To learn more about common challenges security teams might face on their journey to exposure management, check out this report: âVulnerability Management to Exposure Management: A Roadmap for Modernizing Your Application Attack Surface Security.â
Exposure Management (EM), introduced by Gartner in 2022, represents the evolution or vulnerability management. With EM, security teams can address visibility and testing gaps, and stay ahead of threats. This blog includes six signs that your organization needs EM, and five essential requirements to implement it.
With EASM becoming essential to security operations, many vendors are jumping on board, but not all solutions are enterprise-grade. Basic EASM products can waste time, undermine security teams, and offer a false sense of protection. To avoid these pitfalls, ask your vendor these five critical questionsâif they canât answer, itâs a red flag.